/int/ - International

There are several dragon sightings recorded in my hometown's chronicle, they aren't always reliable.

>>15890 Post the sightings. What do they actually say and when did they say it?

>>15892 The first pic from the Lucerne Schilling chronicle says that five persons on the Reuss bridge saw it swimming down the river on 26th May 1491, before it vanished, as well a bad omen was seen in the form of a bull's head in the sun on the left corner. The second pic shows peasants seeing a dragon crap out a stone with supposed healing properties, which is now kept at a local museum.

>>15894 The first could be loch ness monster, also judging by the poor state of the paving it looks like you live in a pretty rough area. Second could be a meteor. Have people investigated what that stone actually is?

>>15898 This is what scientists assumed, but it's apparently solid clay and about 600 years old.

>>15904 Hmmm. Maybe it was a dragon then. But there could be other reasons for that too. Like maybe the original was lost and that's a replacement or the meteor hit but didn't really leave much so people just scooped up the dirt there.

>>15894 i read about one dragon skeleton that was an alligator from the nile, and it got traded up to the north many americans mass hallucinated big foot. just need a good cultural image to redirect schizophrenia towards. similar to how schizos in America all independently developed communist conspiracies but then stopped after USSR

>>15890 He burned down that bridge, right?

>>15945 Lmao no that was tourists in the 90's

>>15889 >The novogorod chronicle made up the city's founding by an incorrect 200 years prior guess What the fuck are you even talking about?

>>15994 the Novgorod chronicle. from the city of Novgorod, using the common naming scheme of 'X chronicle' for early priest written records. You are aware of early history european chronicles right, like that swiss poster? anyway the chronicle just made up the date the city was founded, interesting instance of a primary source pre-medieval historical document just lying

>>15995 So far I only see an american babbling with zero sources, quotes or context.

>>16003 >>15994 He is saying that the chronicle states that the city was founded in the mid 800's, while archeological finds date to the late 10th Century.

>>15889 If news are fake, imagine how fake history is. In periphery of Europe more or less reliable history begins in the 17th century, when there are enough sources to cross-validate them. >>16023 > archeological finds I don't believe in them either. They were done in Stalin's epoch by Lysenko-like "scientists".

>>16024 you can read balkan fiction on wikipedia if you go to like an ottoman sub-division. they'll talk about how X ruled and was X ethnicity and spoke X, then it will go into fanciful personal details of the 'ruler' messaging napoleon or his favorite tea the spartans also never recorded their own history and were suspicious of outsiders. their entire history is made up by romantic and reactionary athenians. after enough time passed and spartans became irrelevant, some of them even believed the history foreigners made up! it was a roman tourist destination

another favorite is when westerners uplifted the ottoman romans. they sent a german down to be king of greece, and he went to the spot where they estimated athens used to be. it was an albanian village. anyway the westerners didnt like the idea of calling them romans, so they taught them to call themselves greek. it was wildly successful, athens is the largest city in greece today built up from an albanian village, and a greek man would come in here and start shouting loud and brown as if the truth of top-down created nationality is an insult. as recently as the cyprus crisis the people there were still calling themselves roman when british troops asked

>>16023 >while archeological finds date to the late 10th Century So he is a braindead clown amerishit filth, as it was expected of his flag. I see. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rurikovo_Gorodische The last thing left to figure out is in which part of the Novgorod First Chronicle did this subhuman amerishit thought he saw it "made up the city's founding by an incorrect 200 years prior".

>>16054 this thread isnt about US waldimir, back to your site

>>16121 This thread was made by a clueless stinky filthy subhuman amerishit insect that claimed some complete bullshit about a specific part of Eastern European medieval history. Nobody forced this subhuman american scum to open its filthy trap or to touch its keyboard with its filthy greasy sausage fingers, not even the hivemind globalist government that controls its behaviours. And yet it did so anyway, it purposefully came here, typed out and posted this retarded thread.

>>16054 >>16126 Meds

>>16128 Unfortunately, the americanism is incurable.

>>16129 OK, at first I didn't notice how bad faith and provocative opening post was and thought "even if OP is wrong, why be so agressive about it". But now I understand you.