/int/ - International

Vee haff wayz to make you post.

Mode: Reply [Return] [Go to bottom]

Subject:
Säge:
Comment:
Drawing: x size canvas
Files:
Password: (For post deletion)
  • Allowed file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, ZIP and more
  • Maximum number of files per post: 4
  • Maximum file size per post: 100.00 MB
  • Read the rules before you post.

il Bernd 2025-10-17 18:56:03 No. 16420
Now that the dust has settled, was architecture modernism good or bad?
Just look at it, it's brutalism for smartphones.
like the 20th century movement or the new mcdonalds buildings
Doesn't matter. 19th century architecture was stuck with brick boxes with façade ornaments.
I like the original Bauhaus style (visited the Bauhaus twice) and I really like that one. It's sleek and modern, but it's also a pleasant place to be in for humans with some cool details, too. I think their style was bastardized into architectural wankery and, even more often, just building a simple box as cheaply as possible. Le Corbusier is another early modernist that I see as more problematic than Bauhaus. He seems to have been a kind of champagne commie who wanted to build efficient but pleasant housing for the masses (not necessarily for people like himself). His ideas were put into use without testing and the results were whole city quarters incompatible with human life.
>>16430 I also visited Bauhaus and I was surprised by how comfy it is. >>16429 Why it doesn't matter?