>>549
Do foreign countries have their own way for citing antic sources as well? In the germoney it's teached and common practice to cite antic sources like DNP does. (Der Neue Pauly, a big antic scientist magazine)
There's a whole own ruling system about how citing antic sources. I'm studying a social science topic and history is my second topic and it's pretty annoying because social science uses APA-citing and history uses "history-style" citing and when citing antic sources there's even another way to do and special authors like Cicero and Platon have special rules to cite their works.Every book and every authour has it's own short form and you need to use those.
>Tac. ann. 11, 26, 1
for example would refer to Tacitus eleventh book, chapter 26, paragraph 1.
This is such a fucking annoying thing. I'm glad I did my old history exam already.